Equivalent explanations and mathematical realism: . Reply to “Evidence, Explanation, and Enhanced Indispensability”

• Autores: Andrea Sereni
• Localización: Synthese, ISSN-e 1573-0964, Vol. 193, Nº. 2, 2016, págs. 423-434
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • The author of “Evidence, Explanation, Enhanced Indispensability” advances a criticism to the Enhanced Indispensability Argument and the use of Inference to the Best Explanation in order to draw ontological conclusions from mathematical explanations in science. His argument relies on the availability of equivalent though competing explanations, and a pluralist stance on explanation. I discuss whether pluralism emerges as a stable position, and focus here on two main points: whether cases of equivalent explanations have been actually offered, and which ontological consequences should follow from these.