How does commercialisation impact on the provision of farm advisory services? Evidence from Belgium, Italy, Ireland and the UK

Katrin Prager; Pierre Labarthe; Monica Caggiano; Altea Lorenzo-Arribas

Ayuda

How does commercialisation impact on the provision of farm advisory services? Evidence from Belgium, Italy, Ireland and the UK

Katrin Prager ^[1] ; Pierre Labarthe ^[2] ; Monica Caggiano ^[2] ; Altea Lorenzo-Arribas ^[1]
1. [1] James Hutton Institute
  
  James Hutton Institute
  
  Reino Unido
2. [2] Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
  
  Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
  
  París, Francia
Localización: Land use policy: The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use, ISSN 0264-8377, ISSN-e 1873-5754, Nº. 52, 2016, págs. 329-344
Idioma: inglés
Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)

Dialnet Métricas: 3 Citas

Resumen
- Farm advisory services have returned to both the academic and the political agenda. Commercialisation—charging a fee for an advisory service—is a trend observed not only in private advisory organisations, but to some extent also in public and other types of organisations. This paper explores how commercialisation of farm advice impacts on the quality of services. Based on key informant interviews and a unique data set from a survey of 227 advisory organisations across four European countries, both the front-office and the back-office dimension were investigated. The paper compares private organisations that draw income from charging for their services with non-private organisations (public, non-governmental and farmer-based organisations). We found that the private organisations are typically small and medium size enterprises that employ fewer advisors than non-private organisations. Their services are more personalised, that is, they have a higher proportion of 1:1 advice and they have a lower ratio of farms per advisor. With regard to the back office dimension, they differ little from non-private organisations in terms of training their advisors but have considerably lower levels of investment in research and development, and tend to rely on peer-to-peer networks and cooperation with other private consultancies and public authorities. We conclude that commercialised advice has several advantages but favours affluent clients. It is essential for commercial advisory services to be complemented with other services that reach different types of farmers, and that public support is available to improve the knowledge flows between public research and private organisations.