The Backward Art of Thinking About Consumer Spending

• Autores: Anne Mayhew
• Localización: Journal of Economic Issues, ISSN 0021-3624, Vol. 48, Nº. 4, 2014, págs. 949-958
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Faced with home foreclosures, a stagnant economy, and weakly-effective federal programs of relief, Richmond, California, considered using eminent domain to acquire mortgages, modify loans to be more affordable, and thus prevent further erosion of the tax base. Strong objections have been lodged against such alteration of property rights, except through bankruptcy and foreclosure processes. The Richmond proposal is considered in the historical context of changes in the use of eminent domain as described by John R. Commons. Just as economic change forced U.S. courts to change the working definitions of property in the late nineteenth century, current contradictions in the way in which we think of households, and the systemic consequences of their management of debt, may produce changes in law and should alter the way in which economists analyze aggregate consumer spending and borrowing.