Here's the bias!: A (Re-)Reassessment of the Chilean electoral system

John Polga-Hecimovich ^[1] ; Peter M. Siavelis ^[2]
1. [1] University of Pittsburgh
  
  University of Pittsburgh
  
  City of Pittsburgh, Estados Unidos
2. [2] Wake Forest University
  
  Wake Forest University
  
  Township of Winston, Estados Unidos
Localización: Electoral Studies: An international Journal, ISSN 0261-3794, Nº 40, 2015, págs. 268-279
Idioma: inglés
Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)

Resumen
- Most scholars of the (now abandoned) Chilean legislative electoral system, known as the “binomial system”, have noted the many ways it was designed to benefit the ideological right. However, Zucco (2007) challenges this conventional wisdom by arguing that there is no bias through the electoral system's majoritarian character, no bias through malapportionment, and that designers could have designed a system to better benefit the ideological right. This paper uses comuna level electoral returns and simulations from Chile's 1988 plebiscite to show that the system was indeed designed to 1) reduce the number of parties in the Chilean party system and 2) minimize electoral losses and maximize electoral gains of the political right. It further argues that, 3) it would have been difficult to design a legislative electoral system to better over-represent the ideological right given the constraints and political context of the time. The analysis strongly supports the rationality of electoral engineering to benefit designers and their allies, even under sub-optimal conditions of limited time and resources. Though the system was abandoned in 2015 in favor of a moderate proportional representation system, it is important to set the record straight in terms of electoral engineers' intents and purposes.