Per una metafisica problematica e dialettica

• Autores: Enrico Berti
• Localización: Acta Philosophica: rivista internazionale di filosofia, ISSN 1121-2179, Vol. 1, Nº. 2, 1992, págs. 176-190
• Idioma: italiano
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 2 Citas
• Resumen

  • J. Habermas and W. Pannenberg have intervened in the recent debate on metaphysics, expounding positions which are in part conflicting. Habermas proposes a post-metaphysical thought which rejects the philosophy of identity, idealism, the primacy of the philosophy of consciousness, and the "strong" concept of theory. Despite the interest of his proposal, Habermas has a negative understanding of metaphysics and fails to take into consideration the Aristotelian line of thought, in which the properly problematic conception of philosophy prevails, i.e., the dialectical questioning of oneself on experience, recognizing the trascendance of the absolute.

    Pannenberg affirms that the cristicism of Heidegger against metaphysics were also directed towards that of Platonic inspiration which culminates in Hegel. However, the Protestant theologian does not recognize that Aristotelian thought maintains its validity also with regard to the idea of God, which is considered as the Transcendant Principle, and not as the One in which are resolved finality and historicity.