It has been alleged that compatibilists are committed to the view that agents act freely and responsibly even when subject to certain forms of radical manipulation. In this paper I identify and elucidate a form of compatibilist freedom, social autonomy, that is essential to understanding what is wrong with ordinary indoctrination, and argue that it also holds the key to understanding what goes wrong in more fanciful manipulation cases
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados