I present a general approach to the debate between the "identity politics" and "politics of distribution" in order to argue that Rawls's conception of distributive justice goes beyond to alocative justice and it is enough to face the claims of recognition. Then I show that under Rawls's interpretation of distributive justice Fraser�s point of view has no basis in so far as she confuses �allocative justice� with �distributive justice�. Fraser not only limits Rawls's conception of primary goods to strictly economic factors, but also she does not grasp the moral perspective of the Rawlsian project. Finally I try to develop a liberal conception to face the demands of recognition. To get this aim, I will put more attention to the Rawls�s notions about redress and self-respect.
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados