Resumen de The Single-Tooth Implant: A Viable Alternative for Single-Tooth Replacement
Todd M. Mayer, Charles E. Hawley, Dr. John C. Gunsolley, Sylvan Feldman
Background: The use of dental implants for single-tooth replacement cases introduces a challenge to the performance of these restorations. Clinical data suggest that single-tooth implant restorations do not benefit from lateral support from the surrounding dentition as do bridged implants, and that these restorations are subjected to greater masticatory forces. Therefore, single-tooth implants are exposed to an increased risk of failure. This prospective clinical trial was designed to evaluate the cumulative success rate of dual acid-etched single-tooth replacement implants in two clinical centers.
Methods: The study protocol included 59 patients between 19 and 73 years. Implants were evaluated for mobility, infection, and crestal bone loss from 30.9 to 60 months.
Results: Seventy-one (71) implants were placed in 59 patients, 20 male and 39 female. Forty-seven (47) were placed in the maxilla and 24 in the mandible. The percentages of anterior and posterior implants were 45.1 % and 54.9%, respectively. A total of 13 (18.4%) implants were placed in soft, poor quality (Type IV) bone. Beginning 1 month post-implant placement, cases were followed for 30.9 to 60 months with a mean followup of 45.9 months. One implant failed (peri-implant infection) yielding an overall success rate of 98.6%.
Conclusions: This success rate for single-tooth replacement dual acid-etched implants compares favorably with bridged implants and with success rates of other single-tooth implant studies. Dual acid-etched implants performed well even under conditions of poor quality bone, where concomitant bone augmentation was performed, and when used for immediate replacement of extracted teeth.
