Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Resumen de Influence of Parameters on Root Surface Roughness Following Treatment With a Magnetostrictive Ultrasonic Scaler:: An In Vitro Study

Matthias Folwaczny, Ute Merkel, Albert Mehl, Reinhard Hickel

  • Background: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of different parameters, i.e., lateral force, instrument power setting, and the shape of the working tip, on the roughness of root surfaces following treatment with a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaling device.

    Methods: The study sample comprised a total of 102 extracted human molars, premolars, canines, and incisors. The samples were randomly divided into 10 equal units of 10 each for treatment with the ultrasonic device at a lateral force of 0.5 N and 2.0 N, low and high instrument power setting, and with a straight and angulated shaped working tip. Twenty samples were treated manually using curets at a lateral force of 0.5 N and 2.0 N. Two samples were left untreated as controls. The mean (Ra) and maximum (Rmax) surface roughness of each sample was recorded. The statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (three-way ANOVA) at a level of significance of 5% (P <0.05).

    Results: The mean surface roughness (±SD) using different parameters ranged from 0.6 ± 0.1 μm to 1.8 ± 0.3 μm. The maximum surface roughness (±SD) was between 4.8 ± 1.3 μm and 17.2 ± 4.3 μm. The mean surface roughness (±SD) for samples treated with curets at a lateral force of 0.5 N was 0.5 ± 0.0 μm and 0.4 ± 0.1 μm at 2.0 N. The maximum surface roughness (±SD) was 3.7 ± 0.8 μm at 0.5 N and 3.9 ± 1.4 μm at 2.0 N.

    Conclusions: The findings of the present study indicate that the shape of the working tip and the lateral force significantly influence the mean and maximum surface roughness of root surfaces treated with a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaling device. At any specific parameter, the surface roughness was signifi- cantly higher for the ultrasonic scaling device as compared to the hand curet. J Periodontol 2004;75:1221-1226.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus