Gettier and the method of explication: : a 60 year old solution to a 50 year old problem

• Autores: Erik J. Olsson
• Localización: Philosophical Studies, ISSN-e 1573-0883, Vol. 172, Nº. 1, 2014, págs. 57-72
• Idioma: alemán
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • I challenge a cornerstone of the Gettier debate: that a proposed analysis of the concept of knowledge is inadequate unless it entails that people don�t know in Gettier cases. I do so from the perspective of Carnap�s methodology of explication. It turns out that the Gettier problem per se is not a fatal problem for any account of knowledge, thus understood. It all depends on how the account fares regarding other putative counter examples and the further Carnapian desiderata of exactness, fruitfulness and simplicity. Carnap proposed his methodology more than a decade before Gettier�s seminal paper appeared, making the present solution to the problem a candidate for being the least ad hoc proposal on the market, one whose independent standing cannot be questioned, among solutions that depart from the usual method of revising a theory of knowledge in the light of counterexamples. As an illustration of the method at work, I reconstruct reliabilism as an attempt to provide an explication of the (externalist) concept of knowledge.