This article addresses a problem that has not been too often raised when reconstructing Basque demonstratives. I will propose that distal plural demonstratives underwent a morphological restructuring ; thus, the dialectal variation we find across texts and nowadays speech (basically aek vs. ek) is due not to phonetic changes, but to the aforesaid morphological reorganizing of the demonstratives. This proposal will be useful for a better understanding of the diachrony of declension, for a better explanation of different accentuation patterns, as well as diachronic dialectology and contact issues.
Artikulu honetan euskal erakusleak berreraiki izan direnean maiz aipatu gabeko arazo batez arduratu naiz. Gradu urruneko erakusleen forma berregituratze morfologiko baten ondorio dela proposatuko dut ; honela, euskalki artean, testuetan zein gaur egungo ahozko jardunean, aurkitzen ditugun aldaerak (aek vs. ek, oinarrian) ez dira aldaketa fonetiko soilen ondorio, arestian aipatutako berregituratze morfologikoarena baizik. Proposamen honek deklinabidearen diakronia hobeki ulertzen lagunduko gaitu, eta baita azentuazio patroi ezberdinak azaltzen ere ; hein berean, kontaktu egoeren zein euskalkien diakroniaren eztabaida ere ukituko du proposamenak.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados