Revisiting desirable response bias in well-being reports

• Autores: Samantha J. Heintzelman, Jason Trent, Laura A. King
• Localización: Journal of Positive Psychology, ISSN-e 1743-9779, Vol. 10, Nº. 2, 2015, págs. 167-178
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Growing popular interest in positive psychology may have important implications for the measurement of well-being. Five studies tested the prediction that well-being ratings are influenced by desirability bias. In Study 1, participants (N?=?176) instructed to fake good endorsed higher well-being; those instructed to fake bad endorsed lower well-being, compared to controls. In Studies 2 and 3 (N�s?=?111, 121), control participants endorsed higher levels of well-being compared to those attached to a bogus pipeline. These differences were mediated by desirability bias. In Study 4 (N?=?417), instruction manipulations did not affect well-being levels, but presenting a desirability measure prior to well-being measures attenuated the correlations between them. In Study 5 (N?=?391), however, this order effect did not replicate. We discuss the importance of continued vigilance for desirability bias in well-being research as a ready solution to this clear problem remains elusive.