In a series of articles, P. Vranas recently proposed a new imperative logic. The strong and weak inferences of this logic are motivated by an appeal to a strong and weak �support by reasons� that transfers from the premisses of an argument to its conclusion. They also combine nonmonotonic and monotonic reasoning patterns. I show that for any moral agent, Vranas�s proposal can be simplified enormously.
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados