Resumen de The review paradox: : on the diachronic costs of not closing rational belief under conjunction
We argue that giving up on the closure of rational belief under conjunction comes with a substantial price. Either rational belief is closed under conjunction, or else the epistemology of belief has a serious diachronic deficit over and above the synchronic failures of conjunctive closure. The argument for this, which can be viewed as a sequel to the preface paradox, is called the �review paradox'; it is presented in four distinct, but closely related versions.
