Ministerial responsiveness in westminster systems: : institutional choices and house of commons debate, 1832-1915

• Autores: Andrew C. Eggers, Arthur Spirling
• Localización: American Journal of Political Science, ISSN-e 1540-5907, Vol. 58, Nº. 4, 2014, págs. 873-887
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • In Westminster systems, governments enjoy strong agenda-setting powers but are accountable to an inquisitorial opposition. This article provides insights into the origins of this arrangement from the British House of Commons, drawing primarily on a new data set of a half million parliamentary speeches. We show that, according to a novel measure we develop, government ministers became more responsive to opposition members of parliament in the same period that the government's agenda power was most conclusively strengthened�roughly, the two decades culminating in Balfour's �railway timetable� of 1902. We argue that this increase in responsiveness helps to explain why opposition members of parliament acceded to reductions in their procedural power. We thus highlight a link between government strength and opposition scrutiny in the historical development of the Westminster system.