Mixed Methods? Do They Really Work? A Commentary

• Cheng, Shu-Ju Ada ^[1]
  1. [1] DePaul University

     DePaul University

     City of Chicago, Estados Unidos

     
• Localización: RIMCIS: Revista Internacional y Multidisciplinar en Ciencias Sociales, ISSN-e 2014-3680, Vol. 2, Nº. 3 (November), 2013, págs. 221-235
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • In this short commentary, I comment on the state and popularity of mixed methods in social sciences in recent decades. While quantitative and qualitative methods are considered complementary, I question the use of mixed methods by scholars without deeper reflections on the epistemological and methodological foundations of these two methods. My contention is that researchers cannot simply combine qualitative and quantitative methods without explicating how they reconcile and negotiate their different foundations. These two methods are not just tools. The act of mixing them without reflections is simply not sufficient. Reconciling and reflecting upon the foundational differences between these two methods would be an essential step.