n this paper, I argue against defining either of �good� and �better� in terms of the other. According to definitions of �good� in terms of �better�, something is good if and only if it is better than some indifference point. Against this approach, I argue that the indifference point cannot be defined in terms of �better� without ruling out some reasonable axiologies. Against defining �better� in terms of �good�, I argue that this approach either cannot allow for the incorruptibility of intrinsic goodness or it breaks down in cases where both of the relata of �better� are bad.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados