Methodological process ethics in international theory
- Autores: Tyler M. Curley
- Localización: International Relations, ISSN-e 1741-2862, Vol. 28, Nº. 2, 2014, págs. 228-238
- Idioma: inglés
- Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
-
Resumen
In this review essay, I identify a commonality between Patrick Thaddeus Jackson�s The Conduct of Inquiry and Daniel J. Levine�s Recovering International Relations: an ethical methodological process to organize international theories in ways that promote a plurality of visions. Jackson�s ideal-typification of the various methodological approaches in international relations encourages a pluralistic science. Likewise, Levine�s constellation method demands a multiplicity of theoretical perspectives, in order to sustain the critical elements intrinsic to each. As I argue, this shared methodological process ethic not only advances theoretical pluralism but, in so doing, actively opens thinking space for constructing alternative political realities.
