This article deals with the Israeli land policy in light of a certain judicial decision made by the Israeli High Court of justice (HCJ). A decision known as the �Land decision� (2002). Following the concept of shared mental models I will claim that the ruling of the HCJ at the given point in time expresses societal preferences formed through a process of learning through which society develops a shared mental model of �alternative behavior� that reflects the way in which individuals and groups adapt to solve the social problems they face in various contexts. This shared mental model provides a frame of reference for the actions of political players such as politicians, special interest groups as well as the Supreme Court in shaping the design and implementation of Israel� land policy. However regarding the Israeli land decision the ability of the Supreme Court to determine policy is limited on the implementation level.
© 2001-2026 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados