Anticristo "mixto", Anticristo "mistico". Varia fortuna de dos expresiones escatológicas medievales.
- Autores: Isaac Vázquez Janeiro
- Localización: Antonianum, ISSN 0003-6064, Nº. 4 (October-December), 1988, págs. 522-550
- Idioma: español
- Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
- Dialnet Métricas: 2 Citas
-
Resumen
Starting from the renowned Franciscan Pierre Jean-Olieu (Olivi) (+ 1298), a typical forerunner of the biblical Antichrist emerges from medieval eschatological literature, namely a first Antichrist emerges from medieval eschatological literature, namely a first Antichrist, pointed out by the sources with the one or the other of these two terms indistinctly; "misticus-mysticus" and "mixtus-mistus". The great scholar R. Manselli, considering them as opposed terms or, at least, as different terms or, at least, as different terms, retained as valid that of "misticus-mysticus" and coined that of "mixtus-mistus" as an error of some transcriber or typographer.
In the present study: 1) information is given of a document yet unknown which makes the use of the term "mixtus-mistus" go back to the beginning of the VXth century; 2) it is observed that "misticus" (with an i) and "mixtus-mistus" have the same derivation (from miscere = "to mix") and the same meaning; 3) finally, one concludes that "mixtus-mistus" and "misticus" (not mysticus) express indistinctly and precisely "The concept" of the first Anti-Christ, whom all the sources in full agreement represent as a hypocritical character, a simulator, mixed with iniquity and virtue.
