Brazil beyond 2020: from deforestation to the energy challenge

• Autores: Emilio Lèbre La Rovere, Carolina Burle Dubeux, Amaro Olimpio Pereira Jr, William Wills
• Localización: Climate Policy, ISSN-e 1752-7457, ISSN 1752-7457, Vol. 13, Nº. Extra 1 (Supp), 2013 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Low Carbon Drivers for a Sustainable World), págs. 70-86
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • The main assumptions and findings are presented on a comparative analysis of three GHG long-term emissions scenarios for Brazil. Since 1990, land-use change has been the most important source of GHG emissions in the country. The voluntary goals to limit Brazilian GHG emissions pledged a reduction in between 36.1% and 38.9% of GHG emissions projected to 2020, to be 6�10% lower than in 2005. Brazil is in a good position to meet the voluntary mitigation goals pledged to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) up to 2020: recent efforts to reduce deforestation have been successful and avoided deforestation will form the bulk of the emissions reduction commitment. In 2020, if governmental mitigation goals are met, then GHG emissions from the energy system would become the largest in the country. After 2020, if no additional mitigation actions are implemented, GHG emissions will increase again in the period 2020�2030, due to population and economic growth driving energy demand, supply and GHG emissions. However, Brazil is in a strong position to take a lead in low-carbon economic and social development due to its huge endowment of renewable energy resources allowing for additional mitigation actions to be adopted after 2020.

    Policy relevance The period beyond 2020 is now relevant in climate policy due to the Durban Platform agreeing a �protocol, legal instrument or agreed outcome with legal force� that will have effect from 2020. After 2020, Brazil will be in a situation more similar to other industrialized countries, faced with a new challenge of economic development with low GHG energy-related emissions, requiring the adoption of mitigation policies and measures targeted at the energy system. Unlike the mitigation actions in the land-use change sector, where most of the funding will come from the national budgets due to sovereignty concerns, the huge financial resources needed to develop low-carbon transport and energy infrastructure could benefit from soft loans channelled to the country through nationally appropriate mitigation actions (NAMAs).