In the most comprehensive treatment of Plato 's Crito to date, Richard Kraut says: �If possible, the Crito ought to be interpreted in a way that makes it consistent with the Apology and the other early Platonic dialogues.� My aim in the following paper is sympathetic to this view. However, the consistency I find is wider in scope than the reconciliation of Socrates' commitment to disobedience in one dialogue and his apparent rejection of disobedience in the other. I seek a reconciliation between the Socratic charge to live an examined life and the demands of a life under law.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados