Class Compromise as Middle Power Activism?: Comparing Brazil and South Africa

• Autores: Janis van der Westhuizen
• Localización: Government and opposition: An international journal of comparative politics, ISSN 0017-257X, Nº. 1, 2013, págs. 80-100
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • One of the most glaring differences between traditional and emerging middle powers relates to their projection of societal values abroad. Since most emerging powers are essentially fragmented multiclass states, class compromise often emerges to intermediate contradictory demands emanating from fragile political coalitions. Against the backdrop of vast income inequalities, and facing some domestic constituencies favouring liberalization on the one hand against pro-redistributive groups on the other, adopting a middle power role, in the cases of South Africa and Brazil, emerges in order to ameliorate these conflicting demands. Two dimensions are examined very briefly, namely recent mediation efforts in Iran and Libya and attempts to effect redistribution by reforming processes of global governance.