Focus groups encourage to combine comparative analysis with approaches paying more attention to interactions. They reveal how schemas, which also are social dispositions dealing with cognition and interpretation, express themselves according to different forms of sociability. Data show that the kind of schema which are used is merely due to social features and do not react to a change of context. At the contrary, ways schemas are used show a higher sensitivity to “participation frames” (Goffman, 1973).
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados