In this paper we explore the consequences for optimality of a social planner adopting two di erent welfare criteria. The framework of analysis is an OLG model with physical and human capital. We rst show that, when the SWF is a discounted sum of individual utilities de ned over consumption per unit of natural labour, the precise cardinalization of the individual utility function becomes crucial for the characterization of the social optimum. Also, decentralizing the social optimum requires an education subsidy. In contrast, when the SWF is a discounted sum of individual utilities de ned over consumption per unit of ecient labour, the precise cardinalization of preferences becomes irrelevant. More strikingly, along the optimal growth path, education should be taxed.
© 2001-2026 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados