Influence of Tipe of Mechanical Loading Menstrual Status and Training Season on Bone Density in Young Women Athletes
- Autores: Debra A. Bemben, Torey D. Buchanan, Michael G. Bemben, Allen W. Knehans
- Localización: Journal of strength and conditioning research: the research journal of the NSCA, ISSN 1064-8011, Vol. 18, Nº. 2, 2004, págs. 220-226
- Idioma: inglés
- Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
-
Resumen
Bone mineral density (BMD) variables were compared in 2 groups of women Division I collegiate athletes�gymnasts (GYM) and cross-country runners (CC)�during the preseason and during the competitive season. An osteogenic advantage may exist in women athletes involved in impact loading (gymnastics) over those women in active loading sports like long-distance running.
The effects of menstrual status and the time of the training season on BMD also were examined. Dietary intake, menstrual status, BMD, and serum estradiol levels were measured during the preseason and during the competitive season in 26 women athletes (18�22 years of age). GYM had significantly higher BMD (p , 0.05) at all sites for both the pre- and posttests compared to CC. Neither group experienced a significant change (p . 0.05) in BMD between trials for any site; however, CC showed slight decreases at all BMD sites from baseline to the posttest. GYM had a higher prevalence of self-reported menstrual cycle disturbances than CC. No significant difference (p . 0.05) in BMD was found between the eumenorrheic and menstrual dysfunction groups (oligo/amenorrheic). In conclusion, the gymnasts had significantly higher (p , 0.05) BMD than the runners, suggesting BMD is influenced by the type of mechanical loading. Menstrual status did not significantly affect BMD in these women athletes.
Cross-country runners were determined to be at greater risk than the gymnasts for low bone mass; thus, it is recommended that these athletes include more high-impact activities in their training regimen to optimize their bone health.
