Resumen de A Comparison of Craniocervical and Cervicothoracic Muscle Strength in Healthy Individuals
Luke Van Wyk, Gwendolen Jull, Bill Vicenzino, Mathew Greaves, Shaun O'Leary
The purpose of this study was to compare maximal torque exerted about the craniocervical (CC) and cervicothoracic (CT) axes in the sagittal plane using a novel dynamometry device. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) recordings in newton-meters (N·m) were measured in 20 males and 20 females for each of 4 tests: CT extension, CT flexion, CC extension, CC flexion. Twenty of the volunteers repeated the testing procedureon a second occasion to determine the test�retest repeatability of the measures. MVC recordings at the CTaxis (extension, 30.24 ± 12.15 N·m; flexion, 18.90 ± 8.21 N·m) were 1.4�2 times greater than recordings at the CC axis (extension, 16.46 ± 7.26 N·m; flexion, 13.34 ± 5.97 N·m). Extensor to flexor strength ratiosreduced from 1.75 at the CT axis to 1.24 at the CC axis, but were similar for both males and females. Good to excellent test�retest repeatability was demonstrated for all tests (ICC = 0.75�0.99, SEM = 0.50�2.44 N·m). Consistent with differences in the muscle morphology at the CC and CT axes, torque exerted about these axes differ. Separate measurement of torque about these axes potentially offers a more comprehensive profile of cervical muscle strength.
