A Scrutiny of the Coaching Education Program Scholarship Since 1995

• Autores: Bryan McCullick, Paul Schempp, Ilse Mason
• Localización: Quest, ISSN 0033-6297, Vol. 61, Nº. 3, 2009, págs. 322-335
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 3 Citas
• Resumen

  • The authors sought to identify and categorize completed coaching education program (CEP) scholarship published in a recent 13-year period to provide a framework regarding the process of how coaches are prepared and certified. Scholarship was defined as data-based investigations, reviews, and position papers focused on CEPs, coaching training, and coaching development. Our review exposed that (a) there was an increasing emphasis on naturalistic research methods, (b) coaches� views and concerns were a major focus, (c) the early part of the era saw scholarship focused on the �what� of CEPs and a call for examining more of the �how� and �why� is being heeded, and (d) few assessments or interventions of CEPs were conducted. The findings provide scholars with a clear view of how the CEP field �sits� (Silverman & Skonie, 1997) and serve as a useful tool for extending the scholarship.