A dispute may arise under complementary treaties, each of which provides for a different dispute settlement procedure. If these procedures are deemed mutually exclusive, which should prevail and according to what criteria? If they are not exclusive, how can the dissimilar procedures be accommodated? These questions implicate basic policies about the role and effect of long-term commitments to compulsory jurisdiction in the international legal order.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados