Ethical theory examines human action in general terms, whereas moral judgment takes place in particular situations. These situations often cannot be subsumed easily under general norms and call for a delicate balance of norms and circumstances. I describe situations where opposing courses of action seem morally reasonable and I call them states of deliberative equilibrium. I review Aristotle¿s and Kant¿s conceptions of moral judgment and I offer a rule for stepping from deliberation to judgment in many situations of equilibrium.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados