Equipment and Running Surface Alter Sprint Performance of College Football Players

• Autores: William F. Brechue
• Localización: Journal of strength and conditioning research: the research journal of the NSCA, ISSN 1064-8011, Vol. 19, Nº. 4, 2005, págs. 821-825
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • Brechue, W.F., J.L. Mayhew, and F.C. Piper. Equipment and running surface alter sprint performance of college football players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 19(4):821-825. 2005.- The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of football equipment and running surface on sprint performance in NCAA Division II football players (n = 68). Players were timed in the 40-yd sprint on an indoor rubberized track (Day 1) and on an outdoor, natural-grass football field (Day 2) wearing either regulation football equipment or shorts and a T-shirt. Each player was assigned randomly to perform 2 trials under each condition on each surface, and the average of the 2 trials was used for analysis. Offensive backs, defensive backs, and linebackers were significantly faster than were offensive and defensive linemen in all trials, and subjects were collapsed into 2 groups, backs and linemen. Football equipment significantly impaired performance on the track (?2.8% ± 1.7%) and the field (?2.9% ± 1.8%). The increase in body mass due to the football equipment was significantly greater for backs (7.2% ± 0.7%) than for linemen (6.5% ± 1.0%), but produced a significantly greater impairment in sprint performance in linemen (?3.3% ± 1.1%) as compared with backs (?2.5% ± 1.5%). Sprint performance was significantly and equivalently impaired when running on grass (backs: ?2.5 ± 1.1%; linemen: ?2.8 ± 1.4%) as compared with the track. Thus, running a 40-yd sprint in football equipment on a natural grass field impairs performance by an average of 5.5% (± 2.3%) compared with running indoors with minimal apparel. Football equipment and running surface significantly impair sprint performance in college football players, the effect being greater in linemen than in backs, and is likely related to differences in muscle strength/power and body fat.