Ends versus means? Ideology and support for repeals in the mass public
- Autores: Nathaniel Birkhead, Jordan Ragusa, Karyn Amira, Sam DeLong
- Localización: Legislative studies quarterly, ISSN 0362-9805, Vol. 50, N. 3, 2025
- Idioma: inglés
- Enlaces
-
Resumen
An important, but poorly understood issue in modern American politics is the conservative wing of the Republican party's interest in repealing legislation. Although existing work shows that conservative Republican elites focus more on repeals than in past decades, it remains unclear what the public thinks about this governance approach. We examine this issue with a survey experiment asking respondents to evaluate four policy proposals in Congress, holding the “ends” constant but randomizing whether they are achieved by enacting a new law or repealing an existing law. Our results show that conservatives favor repeals as a legislative tool more so than liberals and moderates. We also show that this is the result of ideological, rather than partisan considerations. Our findings shed light on both the modern Republican party's approach to governance and a key issue at the nexus of mass attitudes, ideology, and legislative procedure.
