Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


Let-imperatives in English

  • Autores: Peter Collins
  • Localización: International journal of corpus linguistics, ISSN-e 1569-9811, ISSN 1384-6655, Vol. 9, Nº 2, 2004, págs. 299-320
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
  • Resumen
    • This paper reports the findings of a corpus-based study oflet-imperatives in English. Unlike the ordinary lexical verbletmeaning "allow", theletoflet-imperatives serves merely to mark illocutionary meaning. In "first person inclusives", the variant with us-contraction is found to have increased in popularity over recent decades. Furthermore the occurrence of cases wherelet'scan not be interpreted as a contraction oflet ussuggests that syntactic reanalysis has reached an advanced stage amongst some speakers. "Open"let-imperatives, which despite their distinctively optative or deontic-assertive force are grammatically closer to ordinary imperatives, are found to have decreased in popularity in recent decades.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno