La autotutela ejecutiva de la Administración es un tema que nunca ha dejado de tener interés. Sin embargo, este interés no siempre ha ido acompañado del necesario estudio paralelo de la potestad a través de la cual se manifiesta. Al abandonarse toda referencia a la potestad concreta, las disertaciones desde la autotutela ejecutiva pueden convertirse en relaciones inconexas e imprecisas.
La jurisprudencia reciente del Tribunal Supremo sobre la prescripción de la responsabilidad tributaria solidaria muestra los inconvenientes de prescindir de las potestades en el enfoque de las resoluciones jurídicas.
Public Administration’s power to issue enforcement orders is a topic that has never ceased to be of interest. However, this interest has not always been followed by a needed parallel study of the power itself through which it is manifested. By abandoning all reference to this specific power, the dissertations from the Administration’s power to issue enforcement orders may become mere compilations of examples or perceptions of (in)justice, lacking unity and meaning.
This article will use recent jurisprudence of the Spanish Supreme Court about prescription on joint and several liability in the payment of public credits, as it shows the disadvantages of foregoing such powers in the approach to legal resolutions.
© 2001-2026 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados