Maastricht journal of European and comparative law

• 

  Año 2019, Vol. 26, Número 5. Texto Completo Ejemplar

  • Editorial

    • Schrems II. The EU adequacy regime in existential crisis?

      Jan Xavier Dhont

      • Texto completo

      págs. 597-601

      

  • Articles

    • Transnational sustainability laws and the regulation of global value chains:: comparison and a framework for analysis

      Jaakko Salminen, Mikko Rajavuori

      • Resumen
      • Texto completo

      págs. 602-627

      

    • The ECB as Lender of Last Resort in the Eurozone? An analysis of an optimal institutional design of Emergency Liquidity Assistance competence within the context of the Banking Union

      Sara Dietz

      • Resumen
      • Texto completo

      págs. 628-668

      

    • E pluribus unum? Language diversity and the harmonization of company law in the European Union

      Federico M. Mucciarelli

      • Resumen
      • Texto completo

      págs. 669-690

      

    • Is there a public interest in knowing what is going on in society? A comparative study of the European Courts

      Maija Dahlberg, Daniel Wyatt

      • Resumen
      • Texto completo

      págs. 691-712

      

  • Case notes

    • Will the imaginary active consumers please stand up? Case note to Walbusch Walter Busch: Case C-430/17 Walbusch Walter Busch GmbH & Co. KG v. Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs Frankfurt am Main eV, EU:C:2019:47

      Joasia Luzak

      • Resumen
      • Texto completo

      págs. 713-719

      

    • Has the time come to federalize private competition law? The autonomous concept of undertaking in the CJEU's ruling in Case C-724/17 Vantaa v. Skanska: Case C-724/17 Vantaan kaupunki v. Skanska Industrial Solutions Oy and Others, EU:C:2019:204

      Csongor István Nagy

      • Resumen
      • Texto completo

      págs. 720-728