Synthese

• 

  Año 2014, Vol. 191, Número 13

  • Methodological dilemmas and emotion in science

    James W. Mcallister

    • Resumen

    págs. 31-43

    

  • Is science inconsistent?

    Otávio Bueno

    • Resumen

    págs. 2887-2889

    

  • Theory flexibility and inconsistency in science

    Peter Vickers

    • Resumen

    págs. 2891-2906

    

  • Newton versus Leibniz: : intransparency versus inconsistency

    Karin Verelst

    • Resumen

    págs. 2907-2940

    

  • Inconsistency and scientific realism

    Juha Saatsi

    • Resumen

    págs. 2941-2945

    

  • How to avoid inconsistent idealizations

    Christopher Pincock

    • Resumen

    págs. 2957-2972

    

  • The inconsistency of Physics (with a capital "P")

    Robert W. Batterman

    • Resumen

    págs. 2973-2992

    

  • A new characterization of scientific theories

    Jody Azzouni

    • Resumen

    págs. 2993-3008

    

  • Can good science be logically inconsistent?

    Kevin Davey

    • Resumen

    págs. 3009-3026

    

  • Models and scientific representations or: : who is afraid of inconsistency?

    Mathias Frisch

    • Resumen

    págs. 3027-3040

    

  • Physics, inconsistency, and quasi-truth

    Newton C. Da Costa, Décio Krause

    • Resumen

    págs. 3041-3055

    

  • Chunk and permeate III: : the Dirac delta function

    Richard Benham

    • Resumen

    págs. 3057-3062

    

  • Inconsistency in mathematics and the mathematics of inconsistency

    Jean Paul van Bendegem

    • Resumen

    págs. 3063-3078

    

  • The shape of science

    M. Bryson Brown

    • Resumen

    págs. 3079-3109

    

  • Epistemic justification in the context of pursuit: : a coherentist approach

    Dunja Seselja, Christian Straßer

    • Resumen

    págs. 3111-3141