Common market law review

• 

  Año 2012, Vol. 49, Número 2

  • Editorial comments

    • Fundamental rights and EU membership: do as I say, not as I do!

      págs. 481-488

      

  • Articles

    • Reverse Solange-Protecting the essence of fundamental rights against EU Member States

      Armin von Bogdandy, Matthias Kottmann, Carlino Antpöhler, Johanna Dickschen, Simon Hentrei

      • Resumen

      págs. 489-519

      

    • Approximating a workable compromise on access to official documents: the 2011 developments in the European courts

      Dariusz Adamski

      • Resumen

      págs. 521-558

      

    • Restrictions of competition by object under Article 101 TFEU

      David Bailey

      • Resumen

      págs. 559-599

      

    • Judicial review of investigative acts of the European anti-fraud office (OLAF): a search for a balance

      Jan Inghelram

      • Resumen

      págs. 601-627

      

    • The legal mobility of companies within the European Union through cross-border conversion

      Oliver Mörsdorf

      • Resumen

      págs. 629-670

      

  • Case law - Court of Justice of the European Union

    • Case C-208/09, Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v. Landeshauptmann von Wien, Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 December 2010

      Leonard F. M. Besselink

      págs. 671-693

      

    • Case C-360/09, Pfleiderer AG v. Bundeskartellamt, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 14 June 2011

      Sven B. Völcker

      págs. 695-720

      

    • Case C-52/09, Konkurrensverket v. TeliaSonera Sverige AB, Judgment of the Court of Justice (First Chamber) of 17 February 2011

      Wolfgang Wurmnest

      págs. 721-736

      

    • Case C-382/08, Michael Neukirchinger v. Bezirkshauptmannschaft Grieskirchen, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 January 2011

      Thomas Horsley

      págs. 737-751

      

    • Case C-235/09, DHL Express v. Chronopost, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 12 April 2011

      Annette Kur

      págs. 753-766

      

    • Case C-240/09, Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v. Ministerstvo zivotného prostredia Slovenskej republiky, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 8 March 2011

      Mariolina Eliantonio

      págs. 767-791

      

    • Joined Cases C-65/09 & C-87/09, Gebr. Weber GmbH v. Jürgen Wittmer and Ingrid Putz v. Medianess Electronics GmbH, Judgment of the Court of Justice (First Chamber) of 16 June 2011

      Angus Johnston, Hannes Unberath

      págs. 793-807

      

    • Case C-391/09, Malgozata Runevic-Vardyn and Lukasz Pawel Wardyn v. Vilniaus miesto savivaldybes administracija and Others, Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2011

      Hanneke van Eijken

      págs. 809-826