Stanford law review

• 

  Año 2005, Vol. 58, Número 3

  • The ethics and empirics or capital punishment: Editor's note

    págs. 701-702

    

  • Is capital punishment morally required? acts, omissions, and life-life tradeoffs

    Cass R. Sunstein, Adrian Vermeule

    págs. 703-750

    

  • No, capital punishment is not morally required: Deterrence, deontology, and the death penalty

    Carol S. Steiker

    págs. 751-789

    

  • Uses and abuses of empirical evidence in the death penalty debate

    John J. Donohue, Justin wolfers

    págs. 791-845

    

  • Hendricks-Robinson as crowbar: removing the certification bar to disability-based employment-discrimination class actions

    Nathaniel Garrett

    págs. 859-893

    

  • Fixing FACA: The case for exempting presidential advisory committees from judicial review under the federal advisory committee act

    Michael J. Mongan

    págs. 895-933

    

  • Thinking about sexual consent

    Mark Kelman

    págs. 935-987