Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

FAHP Applications for Manufacturing Environments: A Contemporary Review and Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Engineering Networks (ICIEOM 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering ((LNMIE))

  • 344 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a review of recent academic papers (since January 2017 until February 2018) on the FAHP applications on manufacturing environments. The main aim of the research was to identify whether FAHP was still of interest to the academic community, as a previous phase to decide its application on further research that the authors aim to undertake. The main results point out that FAHP applications on manufacturing environments: (1) are still of interest at the light of both the number of publications and the quality of the journals; (2) FAHP is usually not used in isolation but complemented with other tools, mainly TOPSIS; (3) the most common applications are for evaluating and/or selecting suppliers, resources, sustainability, or risk factors; (4) There is a lack of applications on core operational improvement processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akbaş H, Bilgen B (2017) An integrated fuzzy QFD and TOPSIS methodology for choosing the ideal gas fuel at WWTPs. Energy 125:484–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akhundzadeh M, Shirazi B (2017) Technology selection and evaluation in Iran’s pulp and paper industry using 2-filterd fuzzy decision making method. J Clean Prod Part 4 142:3028–3043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al Garni H, Awasthi A (2017) Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia. Appl Energy 206:1225–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Behzadian M, Kazemzadeh RB, Albadvi A, Aghdasi M (2010) PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res 200(1):198–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhat SA, Kumar A (2018) An integrated fuzzy approach for prioritizing supply chain complexity drivers of an Indian mining equipment manufacturer by Kavilal EG, Venkatesan SP, Kumar KDH (2017) Resour Policy 51:204–218. Suggested modification. Resources Policy. ISSN 0301-4207

    Google Scholar 

  6. Breaz RE, Bologa O, Racz SG (2017) Selecting industrial robots for milling applications using AHP. Proc Comput Sci 122:346–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen K, Khan F, Jing X (2018) Safety assessment of natural gas purification plant. Process Saf Environ Prot 113:459–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Churchman CW, Ackoff RL (2016) An approximate measure of value. J Oper Res Soc Am 2(1):1954

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fallahpour A, Olugu E, Musa S, Wong K, Noori S (2017) A decision support model for sustainable supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management. Comput Ind Eng 105:391–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsu C, Chang A, Luo W (2017) Identifying key performance factors for sustainability development of SMEs—integrating QFD and fuzzy MADM methods. J Clean Prod 161:629–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang CL (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Jayawickrama HMMM, Kulatunga AK, Mathavan S (2017) Fuzzy AHP based plant sustainability evaluation method. Procedia Manuf 8:571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jian X, Cai S, Chen Q (2017) A study on the evaluation of product maintainability based on the life cycle theory. J Clean Prod 141:481–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kopacz M, Kryzia D, Kryzia K (2017) Assessment of sustainable development of hard coal mining industry in Poland with use of bootstrap sampling and copula-based Monte Carlo simulation. J Clean Prod 159:359–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kubler S, Robert J, Derigent W, Voisin A, Traon Y (2016) A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications. Expert Syst Appl ISSN 65:398–422 ISSN 0957-4174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van Laarhoven (1983) A fuzzy extensión of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11(1):199–227

    Google Scholar 

  17. Loh HS, Zhou Q, Thai VV, Wong YK, Yuen KF (2017) Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of port-centric supply chain disruption threats. Ocean Coast Manag 148:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. López C, Ishizaka A (2017) A hybrid FCM-AHP approach to predict impacts of offshore outsourcing location decisions on supply chain resilience. J Bus Res ISSN 0148-2963

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mahjouri M, Ishak MB, Torabian A, Manaf LA, Halimoon N (2017) The application of a hybrid model for identifying and ranking indicators for assessing the sustainability of wastewater treatment systems. Sustain Prod Consum 10:21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moayyedian M, Abhary K, Marian R (2018) Optimization of injection molding process based on fuzzy quality evaluation and Taguchi experimental design. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol

    Google Scholar 

  21. Modak M, Pathak K, Ghosh KK (2017) Performance evaluation of outsourcing decision using a BSC and Fuzzy AHP approach: a case of the Indian coal mining organization. Resour Policy 52:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Parkouhi S, Ghadikolaei AS (2017) A resilience approach for supplier selection: using fuzzy analytic network process and grey VIKOR techniques. J Clean Prod 161:431–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodríguez R, Gauthier-Maradei P, Escalante H (2017) Fuzzy spatial decision tool to rank suitable sites for allocation of bioenergy plants based on crop residue. Biomass Bioenerg 100:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Şağbanşua L, Balo F (2017) Multi-criteria decision making for 1.5 MW wind turbine selection. Procedia Computer Science 111:413–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sarkar S, Pratihar D, Sarkar B (2018) An integrated fuzzy multiple criteria supplier selection approach and its application in a welding company. J Manuf Syst 46:163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Seiti H, Hafezalkotob A, Fattahi R (2017) Extending a pessimistic–optimistic fuzzy information axiom based approach considering acceptable risk: application in the selection of maintenance strategy. Appl Soft Comput

    Google Scholar 

  28. Srisawat P, Kronprasert N, Arunotayanun K (2017) Development of decision support system for evaluating spatial efficiency of regional transport logistics. Transp Res Procedia 25:4832–4851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vaidya O, Kumer S (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res 169(1):1–29

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Wan S, Xu G, Dong J (2017) Supplier selection using ANP and ELECTRE II in interval 2-tuple linguistic environment. Inf Sci 385–386:19–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu X, Zhang S, Liao X, Qi X (2018) ELECTRE methods in prioritized MCDM environment. Inf Sci 424:301–316

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Vilutienė T, Lepkova N (2017) Integrated group fuzzy multi-criteria model: case of facilities management strategy selection. Expert Syst Appl 82:317–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zimmer K, Fröhling M, Breun P, Schultmann F (2017) Assessing social risks of global supply chains: a quantitative analytical approach and its application to supplier selection in the German automotive industry. J Clean Prod 149:96–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CIGIP, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n Ed. 8B - 2ª Planta, L Ciudad Politécnica de la Innovación, 46022, Valencia, Spain

    Victor Anaya Fons, Raúl Rodríguez Rodríguez & Angel Ortiz

Authors
  1. Victor Anaya Fons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raúl Rodríguez Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Angel Ortiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Anaya Fons .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, Management and Product Design, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain

    Rodolfo de Castro

  2. Department of Business Administration, Management and Product Design, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain

    Gerusa Giménez

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Anaya Fons, V., Rodríguez Rodríguez, R., Ortiz, A. (2020). FAHP Applications for Manufacturing Environments: A Contemporary Review and Classification. In: de Castro, R., Giménez, G. (eds) Advances in Engineering Networks. ICIEOM 2018. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44530-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44530-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44529-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44530-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation