Abstract
This study suggests the preponderance of the pecking order theory over the trade-off theory when there are greater problems of information asymmetry, which is more usual in small-sized firms. The results show that debt level has an inverse relationship with non-debt tax shield and direct relationship with investment in fixed assets, supporting the trade-off theory. However, the positive coefficient of growth opportunities and negative coefficient of debt cost, age and cash flows is consistent with the prediction of the pecking order theory. Results taken from a sample of small Spanish companies in the footwear sector during the period 1998–2006, revealed that in absence of asymmetric information, firms with positive cash flows will prefer debt because (a) they want to maintain their optimal capital structure; (b) they have greater needs to shield this cash flow from corporate tax and (c) they are concerned about the problem of over-investments, which means that they issue debt in order to discipline the firm’s managers. The relationship between growth opportunities and debt level was positive. This is not surprising due to the need to finance these investment opportunities with debt, because rapidly growing firms are likely to have insufficient earnings to finance internally all of their growth. Furthermore, the low debt level of companies in the Spanish footwear sector also helps to explain this relationship due to the importance of R&D investments for this industry, which lenders value as strategic investments. Finally, small businesses face high transaction costs derived from typical agency problems and financial restriction on capital markets. Such high transaction costs justify the gap between the target and the current debt level and are responsible for the slow approach of their debt level to the target ratio.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acedo MA, Rodríguez JE (2003) Estudio empírico del endeudamiento, coste de la deuda y rentabilidades de la industria de calzado de La Rioja. Comparación por tamaño y sector. Cuadernos de Gestión 3(1–2): 123–142
Anderson TW, Hsiao C (1982) Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. J Econom 18: 47–82
Ang J (1992) On the theory of finance for privately held firms. J Small Bus Finance 1(3): 185–203
Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58: 277–297
Barry CB, Mann SC, Mihov VT, Rodriguez M (2008) Corporate debt issuance and the historical level of interest rates. Financial Manag 37: 413–430
Barton SL, Hill NC, Sundaram S (1989) An empirical test of stakeholder theory predictions of capital structure. Financial Manag 18(1): 36–44
Berger AN, Udell GF (1998) The economics of small business finance: the role of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. J Bank Finance 22: 613–673
Boot A (2000) Relationship banking: what do we know?. J Financial Intermed 9: 26–56
Booth L, Aivazian V, Demirgüc-kunt A, Maksimovic V (2001) Capital structure in developing countries. J Finance 56: 87–130
Bougheas S, Mizen P, Yalcin C (2006) Access to external finance: theory and evidence on the impact of monetary policy and firm-specific characteristics. J Bank Finance 30(1): 199–227
Bradley M, Jarrell GA, Kim EH (1984) On the existence of an optimal capital structure: theory and evidence. J Finance 34(3): 857–880
Cassar G, Holmes S (2003) Capital structure and financing of SMEs: Australian evidence. Account Finance 43: 123–147
Casson PD, Roderick M, Nisar TM (2007) The financing decisions of innovative firms. Res Int Bus Finance 22(2): 208–221
Céspedes J, González M, Molina C (2010) Ownership and capital structure in Latin America. J Bus Res 63: 248–254
Chakraborty I (2010) Capital structure in an emerging stock market: the case of India. Res Int Bus Finance 24: 295–314
Chaplinsky S, Niehaus G (1993) Do inside ownership and leverage share common determinants?. Q J Bus Econ 32(3): 51–65
Chen JJ (2004) Determinants of capital structure of Chinese-listed companies. J Bus Res 57: 1341–1351
Cuñat V (1999) Determinantes del plazo de endeudamiento de las empresas españolas. Investig Econ 23(3): 351–392
De Miguel A, Pindado J (2001) Determinants of capital structure: new evidence from Spanish panel data. J Corp Finance 7: 77–99
Deangelo H, Masulis R (1980) Optical capital structures under corporate and personal taxation. J Financial Econ 8: 3–29
Deesomsak R, Paudyal K, Pescetto YG (2004) The determinants of capital structure: evidence from the Asia Pacific region. J Multinatl Financial Manag 14: 387–405
Diamond D (1989) Reputation acquisition in debt markets. J Political Econ 7(4): 828–862
Fama EF, French KR (2002) Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Rev Financial Stud 15: 1–33
Frank M, Goyal V (2000) Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. J Financial Econ 67(2): 217–248
Frank M, Goyal V (2009) Capital structure decisions: which factors are reliably important?. Financial Manag 38: 1–37
Gaud P, Jani E, Hoesli M, Bender A (2005) The capital structure of Swiss companies: an empirical analysis using dynamic panel data. Eur Financial Manag 11: 51–69
Giannetti M (2003) Do better institutions mitigate agency problems? Evidence from corporate finance choices. J Finance Quant Anal 38: 185–212
González V, González F (2007) Firm size and capital structure: evidence using dynamic panel data. Documentos de Trabajo Funcas 340:1–36
Goyal V, Lehn K, Racic S (2002) Growth opportunities and corporate debt policy: the case of the U.S. defence industry. J Financial Econ 64: 15–37
Graham J, Harvey C (2001) The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J Financial Econ 60: 187–243
Hall P, Graham N (2000) Industry effects on the determinants of unquoted SMEs’ capital structure. Int J Econ Bus 7(3): 297–312
Harris M, Raviv A (1991) The theory of capital structure. J Finance 56(1): 297–355
Huang G, Song FM (2006) The determinants of capital structure: evidence from China. China Econ Rev 17: 14–36
Jalilvand A, Harris RS (1984) Corporate behaviour in adjusting to capital structure and dividend targets: an econometric study. J Finance 39: 127–145
Jensen G, Solberg D, Zorn T (1992) Simultaneous determination of insider ownership, debt and dividend policies. J Financial Quant Anal 27: 247–261
Jensen M (1986) Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. Am Econ Rev 76: 323–329
Kayo E, Kimura H (2010) Hierarchical determinants of capital structure. J Bank Finance 35(2): 358–371
Lemmon ML, Roberts MR, Zender JF (2008) Back to the beginning: persistence and the cross-section of corporate capital structure. J Finance 63: 1575–1608
Lewellen WG, Badrinath SG (1997) On the measurement of Tobin’s q. J Financial Econ 44: 77–122
Lööf H (2004) Dynamic optimal capital structure and technical change. Struct Change Econ Dyn 15: 449–468
López J, Aybar C (2000) An empirical approach to the financial behaviour of small and medium sized companies. Small Bus Econ 14: 55–63
López J, Sogorb F (2008) Testing trade-off and pecking order theories financing SMEs. Small Bus Econ 31: 117–136
López J, Romero M (1997) Estudio comparado de la estructura financiera de la pyme en la Unión Europea. Actualidad Financiera 2: 49–59
Maroto JA (1996) Estructura financiera y crecimiento de las Pymes. Economía Industrial 310: 29–40
Mcclure KG, Clayton R, Hofler RA (1999) International capital structure differences among the G7 nations: a current empirical view. Eur J Finance 5: 141–164
Michaelas N, Chittenden F, Poutziouris P (1999) Financial policy and capital structure choice in UK SMEs: empirical evidence from company panel data. Small Bus Econ 12: 113–130
Miller MH (1977) Debt and taxes. J Finance 32: 261–275
Modigliani F, Miller MH (1958) The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. Am Econ Rev 48: 261–297
Modigliani F, Miller MH (1963) Taxes and the cost of capital: a correction. Am Econ Rev 53: 433–443
Murray F, Goyal V (2003) Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. J Financial Econ 67(2): 217–248
Myers S (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financial Econ 5: 147–175
Myers S (1984) The capital structure puzzle. J Finance 34: 575–592
Myers S, Majluf N (1984) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J Financial Econ 13: 187–221
Rajan RG, Zingales L (1995) What do we Know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. J Finance 50(4): 1421–1460
Ross SA, Westerfield RW, Jaffe J (2008) Corporate finance, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York
Shyam-Sunder L, Myers S (1999) Testing static trade-off against pecking order models of capital structure. J Financial Econ 51: 219–244
Sogorb F (2005) How SME uniqueness affects capital structure: evidence from a 1994–1998 Spanish data panel. Small Bus Econ 25: 447–457
Taggart R (1985) A model of corporate financing decisions. J Finance 32: 1467–1484
Titman S, Wessels R (1988) The determinants of capital structure choice. J Finance 43: 1–19
Van Horne J (1977) Financial management and policy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Wald JK (1999) How firm characteristics affect capital structure: an international comparison. J Financial Res 22(2): 161–187
Wijst N, Thurik R (1993) Determinants of small firms debt ratios: an analysis of retail panel data. Small Bus Econ 5: 55–65
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the University of La Rioja (API07/A19) for its financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Acedo-Ramírez, M.A., Ayala-Calvo, J.C. & Rodríguez-Osés, J.E. Capital structure of small companies in the Spanish footwear sector: relevant factors. SERIEs 4, 155–173 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13209-012-0085-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13209-012-0085-8