Validity of the dental operating microscope and selective dentin removal with ultrasonic tips for locating the second mesiobuccal canal (MB2) in maxillary first molars: an in vivo study

• Liliana A. Camacho-Aparicio ^[1] ; S. Aída Borges-Yáñez ^[1] ; Daniel Estrada ^[1] ; Minerva Azcárraga ^[1] ; Reneé Jiménez ^[1] ; Ricardo González-Plata-R ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

     Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

     México

     
• Localización: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, ISSN-e 1989-5488, Vol. 14, Nº. 6 (June), 2022, págs. 471-478
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Several investigations have determined whether the use of a dental operating microscope (DOM) in combination with selective dentine removal with ultrasonic tips increases the percentage of location of the Mesiobuccal 2 (MB2) root canal in maxillary first molars (MFM). However, these studies did not report the performance of in vivo measurements with the comparison with a gold standard. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of the DOM and selective dentin removal with ultrasonic tips to locate the MB2 root canal in MFM using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) as the gold standard.

    The initial sample size was 91 patients, but 7 were excluded, so the sample size was 84 patients who signed the informed consent. Inclusion criteria: MFM indicated for root canal treatment. An expert blinded observer identified the MB2 in the CBCT. Two standardized examiners (Kappa=91%) performed the clinical assessment in three stages: Stage 1, canal location with an endodontic explorer and a mirror; Stage 2, use of DOM and Stage 3, use of DOM plus selective dentine removal with ultrasonic tips. The validity of each stage was calculated.

    The prevalence of MB2 using CBCT was 79%, by clinical location was 68%. Sensitivity was 79%, 82%, 86% for stage 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Specificity and Positive Predictive Values were 100% for all methods. Negative Predictive Value was 56%, 60%, 67%, respectively. Positive Likelihood Ratio tends to infinity for all methods, Negative Likelihood Ratio= 0.21, 0.18 and 0.14 and Accuracy= 83%, 86% and 89%, respectively.

    The use of DOM with selective dentine removal with ultrasonic tips is the most valid method for locating MB2 canal in MFM. There was an increase in the location of the MB2 root canal with the DOM and ultrasonic tips, which definitely help the clinician.