Influence of the volume of restorative material on the concentration of stresses in the restorative interface

• Marina Pace ^[1] ; Josué-Junior Pierote ^[1] ; João-Victor Câmara ^[2] ; Isabel Barbosa ^[1] ; Cíntia-Tereza Araújo ^[4] ; Lucia Prieto ^[1] ; Guereth-Alexsanderson Carvalho ^[5] ; Gisele Pereira ^[3] ; Renato Vianna ^[3] ; Hana Fried ^[3] ; Justine Tinoco ^[3] ; Amara Santos ^[3] ; Luis-Alexandre Paulillo ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidade Estadual de Campinas

     Universidade Estadual de Campinas

     Brasil

     
  2. [2] Universidade de São Paulo

     Universidade de São Paulo

     Brasil

     
  3. [3] Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

     Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

     Brasil

     
  4. [4] Adjunct Professor, Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  5. [5] Master student, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, ISSN-e 1989-5488, Vol. 13, Nº. 6 (June), 2021, págs. 558-563
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • To evaluate the microtensile strength in the adhesive interface depending on the volume of the composite resin used to restore class I cavities.

    Forty-eight human third molars received a standardized class I cavity preparation and they were separated into six experimental groups: G1 – single-bottle adhesive system; G2 - bonding system with load; G3 – single-bottle adhesive associated with low-viscosity composite resin; G4 – loaded adhesive associated with low-viscosity composite; G5 - resin-modified glass ionomer associated with single-bottle adhesive; and G6 - resin-modified glass ionomer associated with loaded adhesive. All cavities were restored with a universal restorative composite. After completing the restorations, the samples were stored for seven days in a stove (37°C) and the microtensile bond strength was evaluated by producing slices and applying axial loading in an Instron universal testing machine at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The thickness of the intermediate layer formed on the cavity floor to verify the relationship between the volume of restorative composite and the concentration of stresses in the buccal wall. With the data obtained in the microtensile strength test, an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed entirely at random.

    Duncan’s test showed that group 4 (Filtek Flow/Optibond Solo Plus) obtained the highest mean of microtensile strength with no statistically significant difference to groups 3 (Filtek Flow/Single Bond), 5 (Vitremer/Single Bond), and 6 (Vitremer/Optibond Solo Plus). It also showed a statistically significant difference to groups 2 (Optibond Solo Plus) and 1 (Single Bond), with no statistical difference between the other groups studied.

    The highest mean of microtensile strength was obtained when the volume of the restorative material decreased through the interposition between the material and the adhesive system of a base with low elasticity modulus.