Response to Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”

• Autores: Christopher Anderson, Štěpán Bahník, Michael Barnett-Cowan, Frank A. Bosco
• Localización: Science, ISSN 0036-8075, Vol. 351, Nº 6277, 2016, págs. 1037-1037
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration’s Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.