I summarize and criticize Derek Parfit's impressive attempt to reconcile the Kantian and the Consequentialist approaches to moral thinking, and argue that his �cognitive non-naturalism� fails to do justice to the roots of moral sentiment in personal relations. I outline the destructive effect of �trolley problems� on ethical reasoning, and mount a case for seeing moral reasoning as a consequence of �reactive� attitudes, arising from the attempt to reach a rational consensus in the things that we praise and blame.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados