Comparison of Four Different Methods to Measure Power Output During the Hang Power Clean and the Weighted Jump Squat

• Autores: Naruhiro Hori, Robert U. Newton, Warren A. Andrews, Naoki Kawamori, Michael R. McGuigan
• Localización: Journal of strength and conditioning research: the research journal of the NSCA, ISSN 1064-8011, Vol. 21, Nº. 2, 2007, págs. 314-320
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 6 Citas
• Resumen

  • Hori, N., R.U. Newton, W.A. Andrews, N. Kawamori, M.R. McGuigan, and K. Nosaka. Comparison of four different methods to measure power output during the hang power clean and the weighted jump squat. J. Strength Cond. Res. 21(2):314- 320. 2007.-Measurement of power output during resistance training is becoming ubiquitous in strength and conditioning programs, but there is great variation in the methods used. The main purposes of this study were to compare the power output values obtained from 4 different methods and to examine the relationships between these values. Male semiprofessional Australian rules football players (n = 30) performed hang power clean and weighted jump squat while ground reaction force (GRF)-time data and barbell displacement-time data were sampled simultaneously using a force platform and a linear position transducer attached to the barbell. Peak and mean power applied to the barbell was obtained from barbell displacement-time data (method 1). Peak and mean power applied to the system (barbell + lifter) was obtained from 3 other methods: (a) using GRF-time data (method 2), (b) using barbell displacement-time data (method 3), and (c) using both barbell displacement-time data and GRF-time data (method 4). The peak power values (W) obtained from methods 1, 2, 3, and 4 were (mean ± SD) 1,644 ± 295, 3,079 ± 638, 3,821 ± 917, and 4,017 ± 833 in hang power clean and 1,184 ± 115, 3,866 ± 451, 3,567 ± 494, and 4,427 ± 557 in weighted jump squat. There were significant differences between power output values obtained from method 1 vs. methods 2, 3, and 4, as well as method 2 vs. methods 3 and 4. The power output applied to the barbell and that applied to the system was significantly correlated (r = 0.65-0.81). As a practical application, it is important to understand the characteristics of each method and consider how power output should be measured during the hang power clean and the weighted jump squat.