Publication: El local de los representantes de los trabajadores
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2017-01-25
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El objeto de estudio de la presente tesis es el derecho de los representantes de los trabajadores y de los funcionarios, así como de las secciones sindicales, a disponer de un local adecuado que permita el ejercicio de sus funciones representativas. El objetivo general es averiguar cuáles son las consecuencias jurídicas vinculadas al hecho de que un mismo derecho esté sometido a distintas regulaciones legales en función de quién sea su titular, a pesar de que puede, y suele ocurrir, que el espacio que comparten todos ellos sea físicamente el mismo. Las dos principales hipótesis específicas de partida son: a) las respectivas formulaciones legales del derecho tienen un elevado componente de indeterminación, por lo que la interpretación de los tribunales tiene que devenir clave para que su ejercicio sea efectivo.; b) las distintas regulaciones legales implican también diferentes vías de reclamación y protección del derecho, lo que probablemente llevará a soluciones dispares. La metodología empleada ha consistido en la observación, descripción, análisis y valoración crítica del objeto de estudio. Para ello, se ha recurrido a dos técnicas específicas de la ciencia jurídica: 1) la de análisis de legislación, aplicando el método histórico y el método analógico; y 2) la técnica legislativa, dedicada a la modificación y elaboración tanto de las disposiciones legislativas como de las doctrinas jurisprudenciales. Además de los dos métodos clásicos citados, se ha hecho uso de otros métodos generales que son trasladables a la investigación jurídica, como el discursivo, el sistemático, el deductivo, el inductivo, el fenomenológico e incluso el intuitivo...
The study object of this thesis is the right of workers' representatives and officials, as well as the unions, to have an appropriate place that allows for the exercise of their representative functions. The overall objective is to find out what are the legal consequences due to the fact that the same law is subject to different legal regulations depending on who is the owner, even though that physical space could and usually is shared by all the parties. The two main specific hypotheses are: a) the respective legal formulations of the law have a high component of uncertainty, so the interpretation of the courts has to become a key part to help make the law enforcement more effective .; b) the different regulations also involve different legal remedies and legal protections, which will likely lead to disparate solutions. The methodology used consisted of observation, description, analysis and critical evaluation of the object of study. To this end, I have resorted to two specific techniques of legal science: 1) legislative analysis, using the historical method and the analogy method; and 2) the legislative technique, dedicated to the development and modification of both the legislation and the case law doctrines. Besides the two classical methods mentioned, we have made use of other general methods that are equivalent to legal research, as are: the discursive, systematic, deductive, inductive, phenomenological and even the intuitive methods. Serving as a foundation for the development of the research activity is the analysis of the scientific doctrine as well as the decisions of the courts. The literature consulted consists mainly of the more than 230 works cited in the bibliography. The judicial doctrine was obtained from the detailed analysis of more than 400 statements...
The study object of this thesis is the right of workers' representatives and officials, as well as the unions, to have an appropriate place that allows for the exercise of their representative functions. The overall objective is to find out what are the legal consequences due to the fact that the same law is subject to different legal regulations depending on who is the owner, even though that physical space could and usually is shared by all the parties. The two main specific hypotheses are: a) the respective legal formulations of the law have a high component of uncertainty, so the interpretation of the courts has to become a key part to help make the law enforcement more effective .; b) the different regulations also involve different legal remedies and legal protections, which will likely lead to disparate solutions. The methodology used consisted of observation, description, analysis and critical evaluation of the object of study. To this end, I have resorted to two specific techniques of legal science: 1) legislative analysis, using the historical method and the analogy method; and 2) the legislative technique, dedicated to the development and modification of both the legislation and the case law doctrines. Besides the two classical methods mentioned, we have made use of other general methods that are equivalent to legal research, as are: the discursive, systematic, deductive, inductive, phenomenological and even the intuitive methods. Serving as a foundation for the development of the research activity is the analysis of the scientific doctrine as well as the decisions of the courts. The literature consulted consists mainly of the more than 230 works cited in the bibliography. The judicial doctrine was obtained from the detailed analysis of more than 400 statements...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Derecho, leída el 11/01/2016