Student proposals to prevent academic plagiarism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.6154

Keywords:

Plagiarism, ethics, integrity, teacher training, competency

Abstract

The digital transformation of the production of works in the university world offers us many advantages as well as obligatory precautions in the institutions to avoid dishonest practices. There are many studies in the literature on academic plagiarism, but on few occasions those most interested in the solution are asked, such as the students themselves, the vast majority of whom obtain their degrees through hard work and who are most affected by these bad practices. The research design was non-experimental of cross-sectional type with a questionnaire and reliability of Cronbach's Alpha 0.775, obtaining data from 823 students from 10 institutions and 3 different Latin American countries on the solutions they see as most effective, their knowledge of the preventive measures of their institutions and how competent they see themselves at an individual level to avoid it. The research design analyzes quantitative and qualitative data... The students' main solutions consist of three types, a formative preventive first, a punitive second and a totally lax third. Showing higher self-perception in terms of competence to deal with plagiarism in higher grades.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, L., Anderson, V., & Spronken-Smith, R. (2017). “It”s not fair’: policy discourses and students’ understandings of plagiarism in a New Zealand university. Higher Education, 74(1), 17–32. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-016-0025-9

Amiri, F., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2016). On Iranian EFL Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9245-3

Bretag, T. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8

Cabero-Almenara, J., Guillén-Gámez, F.F., Ruiz-Palmero, J. & Palacios-Rodríguez, A.,. (2021). Digital competence of higher education professor according to DigCompEdu. Statistical research methods with ANOVA between fields of knowledge in different age ranges. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10476-5

Carretero, S., Vuorikari, V. And Punie, Y. (2018). DigComp 2.1: the digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. EU. https://op.europa.eu/s/pDOB

Cebrián-Robles, V., & Raposo-Rivas M y Sarmiento-Campos J. (2016). ¿Ética o prácticas deshonestas? El plagio en las titulaciones de Educación. Revista Educación, 374, 161–182. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2016-374-330

Cebrián-Robles, V., Raposo-Rivas, M., Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M., & Sarmiento-Campos, J. A. (2018). Percepción sobre el plagio académico de estudiantes universitarios españoles. Educación XX1, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.20062

Comas-Forgas, R., & Sureda-Negre, J. (2010). Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors from Students’ Perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8(3), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-010-9121-0

Ehrich, J., Howard, S. J., Mu, C., & Bokosmaty, S. (2014). A comparison of Chinese and Australian university students’ attitudes towards plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927850

Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J., Torres-Hernández, N., & Pessoa, T. (2019). Competencia de futuros docentes en el área de seguridad digital. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 27(61), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.3916/C61-2019-05

Gasparyan, A. Y., Nurmashev, B., Seksenbayev, B., Trukhachev, V. I., Kostyukova, E. I., & Kitas, G. D. (2017). Plagiarism in the Context of Education and Evolving Detection Strategies. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(8), 1220–1227. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.8.1220

Kaktiņš, L. (2018). Contract cheating advertisements: what they tell us about international students’ attitudes to academic integrity. Ethics and Education, 13(2), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2017.1412178

López-Puga, J. (2014). Análisis y reducción del plagio en la universidad. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 7(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.30552/ejep.v7i2.102

Redecker, C. (2017). Marco europeo para la competencia digital de los educadores. DigCompEdu. Comisión Europea. https://acortar.link/wU3qRH

Sureda-Negre, J., Comas-Forgas, R., & Oliver-Trobat, M.-F. (2015). Plagio académico entre alumnado de secundaria y bachillerato: Diferencias en cuanto al género y la procrastinación. Comunicar, 22(44), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-11

Sureda-Negre, J., Cerdá-Navarro, A., Calvo-Sastre, A. y Comas-Forgas, R., (2019). Las conductas fraudulentas del alumnado universitario español en las evaluaciones: valoración de su gravedad y propuestas de sanciones a partir de un panel de expertos. Revista de Investigación Educativa, vol. 38, núm. 1, pp. 201–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.358781

Walker, C., & White, M. (2014). Police, design, plan and manage: developing a framework for integrating staff roles and institutional policies into a plagiarism prevention strategy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(6), 674–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2014.957895

Zrnec, A., & Lavbič, D. (2017). Social network aided plagiarism detection. British Journal of Educational Technology: Journal of the Council for Educational Technology, 48(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12345

Downloads

Published

2021-12-01

How to Cite

Cebrián-Robles, V., Raposo-Rivas, M., Ruiz Rey, F. J., & Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M. (2021). Student proposals to prevent academic plagiarism. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (16), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.6154

Issue

Section

Artículos

Most read articles by the same author(s)