Validity and reliability of smartphone high-speed camera and Kinovea for velocity-based training measurement

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/107173
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Validity and reliability of smartphone high-speed camera and Kinovea for velocity-based training measurement
Autor/es: Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose Manuel | Penichet-Tomás, Alfonso | Villalón-Gasch, Lamberto | Pueo, Basilio
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Research in Physical Education, Fitness and Performance (RIPEFAP)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Didáctica General y Didácticas Específicas
Palabras clave: Technology | Instrument | Video | Barbell | Half squat | Biomechanics
Área/s de conocimiento: Educación Física y Deportiva
Fecha de publicación: 2021
Editor: Universidad de Alicante. Área de Educación Física y Deporte
Cita bibliográfica: Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2021, 16(4): 878-888. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.164.11
Resumen: The aim of this study was to validate the combination of smartphone high-speed camera and motion analysis software Kinovea methodology (SHSC-Kinovea) to measure kinematic variables of velocity-based training during back squat exercises. Fifteen athletes were voluntarily recruited for the study (age 22.8 ± 2.9 years, height 182.9 ± 8.9 cm, body mass 79.5 ± 9.6 kg). High-speed video recordings with a smartphone at 240 fps were used against a criterion linear force transducer (LPT) for measuring displacement of the barbell (RB), mean velocity (MV), maximum velocity (Vmax) and concentric phase time (CPT). The intra-class correlations coefficient between LPT and SHSC-Kinovea showed almost perfect agreement for consistency (.992, .995, .997, .993) and absolute agreement (.975, .978, .980, .964) for RB, MV, Vmax and CPT, respectively. The mean differences between instruments were 1.11 mm for RB, 0.03 m/s for MV, 0.05 m/s for Vmax and 65.91 ms for CPT, all p < .001. Bland-Altman plots showed low systematic bias ± random error for RB: 1.11 ± 1.50 cm (r2: .006), MV: 0.03 ± 0.33 m/s (r2: .001) and Vmax: 65.91 ± 63.82 m/s (r2: .11), whereas Vmax showed overestimation for the high range of measures: 0.55 ± 0.42 m/s (r2: .31). Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient showed almost perfect association between all variables: (r = .985 - .990) (p < .001). The SHSC-Kinovea methodology resulted in similar kinematic values than criterion so it can be considered as a trustworthy instrument for measuring velocity-based training.
Patrocinador/es: This study was supported by vice-rectorate program of research and knowledge transfer for the promotion of R+D+I at the University of Alicante (Ref. GRE18-19).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/107173
ISSN: 1988-5202
DOI: 10.14198/jhse.2021.164.11
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.164.11
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - SCAPE - Artículos de Revistas
INV - HEALTH-TECH - Artículos de Revistas
Journal of Human Sport and Exercise - 2021, Vol. 16, No. 4

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailJHSE_16-4_11.pdf508,08 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons