Prehistory of Verbal Markers in Hmong: What Can We Say?
-
Nathan M. White [1]
-
[1] James Cook University
James Cook University
Australia
-
- Localización: Studia linguistica: A journal of general linguistics, ISSN 0039-3193, Vol. 75, Nº 2, 2021, págs. 345-374
- Idioma: inglés
- Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
-
Resumen
Historical reconstruction of verbal modification in the Hmong-Mien family remains largely untouched in the literature. The current work explores, in light of comparative data and fieldwork, the history of four verbal markers in Laotian Hmong: 1) ʃi55–/ʃi22– ‘associative-reciprocal’, 2) ti55–/tɵɐ̯55– ‘single, only’, 3) ʈʂɑ̤͡ɵ̤42/t͡ʃɑ̤͡ɵ̤42 ‘pseudo-passive’, and 4) tɑ͡ɵ22/tɑ̤͡ɵ̤42 ‘be physically able’. The verbal marker ʃi55–/ʃi22– likely appeared in Proto-Hmongic with a reciprocal meaning, while ti55–/tɵɐ̯55– is reconstructible to Proto-Far Western Hmongic as an adverbial marker. The form ʈʂɑ̤͡ɵ̤42/t͡ʃɑ̤͡ɵ̤42 originates in a primary verb in Proto-Hmongic, and later developed into a pseudo-passive marker and copula. Finally, tɑ͡ɵ22/tɑ̤͡ɵ̤42 is reconstructible to Proto-Far Western Hmongic as a verb meaning ‘(be) strong, physically able’ that also marked ability to perform an action. This chapter should be of interest not only to Hmong-Mienists and those working in Southeast Asia, but also to those developing working methodologies for language families lacking a long written history.
