Extending influence on social media: The behaviour of political talk-show opinion leaders on Twitter
Main Article Content
Abstract
Social media, especially Twitter, has become a strategic space for those users who try to extend their influence in the digital environment. This work focuses on opinion leaders who participate in political talk-shows. The aim is to analyse the use and the thematic agenda proposed by these actors on Twitter during electoral periods. The Twitter profiles of 20 opinion leaders (journalists, media editors and experts) of four Spanish television channels are examined. A quantitative content analysis is used on 2,588 tweets disseminated during the November 2019 general election campaign in Spain by them. Results show differences between the different types of actors who make up the sample. Journalists use Twitter to express their criticisms and reinforce their community of followers, especially using interaction and humour. Media editors are more neutral and promote their personal brand through the promotion of their media companies. Experts inform and analyse political news more than journalists, although they also criticise and respond to citizens’ comments. Regarding the subject agenda, messages on electoral results and media content predominate. Thus, the data shows how opinion leaders take advantage of Twitter to freely show their opinions, especially negative ones, and boost dialogue with users.
Keywords
References
Alonso-Muñoz, L. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018). Political agenda on Twitter during the 2016 Spanish elections: issues, strategies, and users’ responses. Communication & Society, 31(3), 7-25. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.31.3.7-25
Alonso-Muñoz, L., Marcos-García, S. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017). Political leaders in (inter)action. Twitter as a strategic communication tool in electoral campaigns. Trípodos, 39, 71-90. Retrieved from http://www.tripodos.com
Anspach, N. M. (2017). The New Personal Influence: How Our Facebook Friends Influence the News We Read. Political Communication, 590-606. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1316329
Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A. & Watts, D. J. (2011). Everyone’s an influencer: Quantifying influence on Twitter. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 65-74). New York: ACM.
Bennett, W. L. & Manheim, J. B. (2006). The one-step flow of communication. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 608(1), 213-232.
Bentivegna, S. (2015). A colpi di tweet: la politica in prima persona. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Bodrunova, S. S., Litvinenko, A. A. & Blekanov, I. S. (2018). Please follow us: media roles in Twitter discussions in the United States, Germany, France, and Russia. Journalism Practice, 12(2), 177-203. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1394208
Brems, C., Temmerman, M., Graham, T. & Broersma, M. (2017). Personal Branding on Twitter: How Employed and Freelance Journalists Stage Themselves on Social Media. Digital Journalism, 5(4), 443-459. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1176534
Broersma, M. & Graham, T. (2013). Twitter as a News Source: How Dutch and British Newspapers used tweets in the news coverage, 2007-2011. Journalism Practice,7(4), 446-464. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.802481
Canter, L. (2015). Personalised Tweeting: The Emerging Practices of Journalists on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 3(6), 888-907. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.973148
Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y Poder. Barcelona: UOC.
Dang-Xuan, L., Stieglitz, S., Wladarsch, J. & Neuberger, C. (2013). An investigation of influentials and the role of sentiment in political communication on Twitter during election periods. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 795-825. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.783608
Dubois, E. & Gaffney, D. (2014). The multiple facets of influence: identifying political influentials and opinion leaders on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1260-1277. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764214527088
Enli, G. & Simonsen, C. A. (2018). ‘Social media logic’ meets professional norms: Twitter hashtags usage by journalists and politicians. Information, Communication & Society, 21(8), 1081-1096. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301515
Feenstra, R. A. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2014). Democracy in the Digital Communication Environment: A Typology Proposal of Political Monitoring Processes. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2448-2468. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2815
Fernández Gómez, J. D., Hernández-Santaolalla, V. & Sanz-Marcos, P. (2018). Influencers, marca personal e ideología política en Twitter. Cuadernos.info, 42, 19-37 . https://www.doi.org/10.7764/cdi.42.1348
Gainous, J. & Wagner, K. (2014). Tweeting to power. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goggins, S. & Petakovic, E. (2014). Connecting theory to social technology platforms: A framework for measuring influence in context. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1376-1392. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764214527093
Goldenberg, J., Lehman, D. R., Shidlovski, D. & Barak, M. (2006). The Role of Expert Versus Social Opinion Leaders in New Product Adoption. Marketing Science Institute Report, 6(4), 67-84. Retrieved from https://www.msi.org/reports/the-role-of-expert-versus-social-opinion-leaders-in-new-product-adoption/
Goldenberg, J., Han, S., Lehman, D. R. & Hong, J. W. (2009). The Role of Hubs in the Adoption Process. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 1-13. https://www.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.2.1
Gruzd, A. & Wellman, B. (2014). Networked influence in social media: introduction to the special issue. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1251–1259. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764214527087
Hanusch, F. 2(017). Political Journalists’ Corporate and Personal Identities on Twitter Profile Pages: A Comparative Analysis in Four Westminster Democracies. New Media & Society, 1–18. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444817698479
Hunter, A. (2015). Crowdfunding Independent and Freelance Journalism: Negotiating Journalistic Norms of Autonomy and Objectivity. New Media & Society, 17(2), 272-288. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444814558915
Jackson, N. & Lilleker, D. (2011). Microblogging, constituency service and impression management: UK MPs and the use of Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(1), 86-105. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.545181
Jungherr, A. (2014). The logic of political coverage on Twitter: Temporal dynamics and content. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 239-259. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12087
Katz, E. & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H. & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 591-600). New York: ACM.
Lair, D. J., Sullivan, K. & Cheney, G. (2005). Marketization and the recasting of the professional self: The rhetoric and ethics of personal branding. Management Communication Quarterly, 18(3), 307-343. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0893318904270744
Larsson, A. O. (2017). The news user on social media: A comparative study of interacting with media organizations on Facebook and Instagram. Journalism Studies, 1-18. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1332957
Lasorsa, D., Lewis, S. C. & Holton, A. (2012). Normalizing Twitter: Journalism Practice in an Emerging Communication Space. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19-36. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825
Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B. & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University.
López-Meri, A. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2016). El debate de la actualidad periodística española en Twitter: Del corporativismo de periodistas y políticos al activismo ciudadano. Observatorio (OBS*), 10(3), 56-79. https://www.doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS1032016994
López-Meri, A. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017). Las estrategias de los periodistas para la construcción de marca personal en Twitter: posicionamiento, curación de contenidos, personalización y especialización. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 8(1), 59-73. https://www.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2017.8.1.5
López-Meri, A., Marcos-García, S. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017). What do politicians do on Twitter? Functions and communication strategies in the Spanish electoral campaign of 2016. El profesional de la información, 26(5), 795-804. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.02
López-Rabadán, P. & Mellado, C. (2019). Twitter as a space for interaction in political journalism. Dynamics, consequences and proposal of interactivity scale for social media. Communication & Society, 32(1), 1-18. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.32.1.1-18
Mancera-Rueda, A. (2014). Cortesía en 140 caracteres: interacciones en Twitter entre periodistas y prosumidores. Revista de Filología, 32, 163-180. Retrieved from https://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/4646
Marcos-García, S., Alonso-Muñoz, L. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017). Usos ciudadanos de Twitter en eventos políticos relevantes. La #SesiónDeInvestidura de Pedro Sánchez”. Comunicación y Hombre, 13, 25-49. Retrieved from http://www.comunicacionyhombre.com/pdfs/13_e01_marcosalonsoycasero.pdf
Molyneux, L. (2015). What Journalists Retweet: Opinion, Humor and Brand Development on Twitter. Journalism, 16(7), 920-935. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884914550135
Molyneux, L., Holton, A. E. & Lewis, S. C. (2018). How Journalists Engage in Branding on Twitter: Individual, Organizational and Institutional Levels. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1386-1401. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1314532
Mutz, D. C. & Young, L. (2011). Communication and public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 1018-1044. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr052
Noguera-Vivo, J. M. (2013). How Open Are Journalists on Twitter? Trends Towards the End-user Journalism. Communication and Society, 26(1), 93-114. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.26.1.95-116
Papacharissi, Z. & De Fátima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62, 266–282. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x
Pérez-Soler, S. & Micó-Sanz, J. LL. (2015). El mito de la conversación global. Usos de Twitter en las redacciones periodísticas catalanas y belgas. El profesional de la información,24(3), 246–255. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.may.04
Rogers, E.M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Valente, T. W. & Pumpuang, P. (2007). Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change. Health Education & Behavior, 34(6), 881-896. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1090198106297855
Vis, F. (2013). Twitter as a Reporting Tool for Breaking News: Journalists Tweeting the 2011 UK Riots. Digital Journalism, 1(1), 27-47. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.741316
Vishwanath, A. & Barnett, G. A. (Eds.) (2011). The diffusion of innovations: A communication science perspective. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Xu, W.W., Sang, Y., Blasiola, S. & Park, H. W. (2014). Predicting opinion leaders in Twitter activism networks: The case of the Wisconsin recall election. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1278-1293. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764214527091
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.